On 26.01.2021 12:56, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH v3 01/15] gunzip: drop INIT{,DATA} and STATIC"):
>> There's no need for the extra abstraction.
>
> Thanks for tidying things up.
>
> Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Thanks.
>> Requeste
Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH v3 01/15] gunzip: drop INIT{,DATA} and STATIC"):
> There's no need for the extra abstraction.
Thanks for tidying things up.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
> Requested-by: Andrew Cooper
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
However, I think this is a refacto
On 26.01.2021 10:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> There's no need for the extra abstraction.
>
> Requested-by: Andrew Cooper
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
This, of course, is 07/15. Sorry.
Jan
> ---
> v3: New.
>
> --- a/xen/common/gunzip.c
> +++ b/xen/common/gunzip.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ static unsign
There's no need for the extra abstraction.
Requested-by: Andrew Cooper
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v3: New.
--- a/xen/common/gunzip.c
+++ b/xen/common/gunzip.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ static unsigned __initdata inptr;
static unsigned __initdata outcnt;
#define OF(args)args
-#define STA
