On 2/22/21 11:16 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It is on my list of things to look at. While probably not a good excuse,
> my looking at previous versions of this makes we somewhat hesitant to
> open any of these patch mails ... But I mean to get to it.
>
> Jan
>
Thanks for this response. I did comb
On 22.02.2021 19:04, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> I just wanted to request more feedback on this series and put it on the
> radar, while acknowledging
> that I'm sure given the recent code freeze it is a busy time for everybody.
It is on my list of things to look at. While probably not a good excuse,
Hey all,
I just wanted to request more feedback on this series and put it on the radar,
while acknowledging
that I'm sure given the recent code freeze it is a busy time for everybody.
Best,
Bob
On 22.01.2021 22:18, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:39:28AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.01.2021 01:51, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>>> I followed with v2 feedback and attempted to convert the PE/COFF header
>>> into C instead of ASM. Unfortunately, this was only possible for t
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:39:28AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.01.2021 01:51, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > I followed with v2 feedback and attempted to convert the PE/COFF header
> > into C instead of ASM. Unfortunately, this was only possible for the
> > first part (Legacy) of the PE/COFF head
On 22.01.2021 01:51, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> This is version 3 for a patch set sent out to the ML in 2018 [1] to
> support UEFI Secure Boot for Xen on multiboot2 platforms.
>
> A new binary, xen.mb.efi, is built. It contains the mb2 header as well
> as a hand-crafted PE/COFF header. The dom0 ker
This is version 3 for a patch set sent out to the ML in 2018 [1] to
support UEFI Secure Boot for Xen on multiboot2 platforms.
A new binary, xen.mb.efi, is built. It contains the mb2 header as well
as a hand-crafted PE/COFF header. The dom0 kernel is verified using the
shim lock protocol.
I foll
