Re: [PATCH v3] xen/riscv: Increase XEN_VIRT_SIZE

2025-04-14 Thread Jan Beulich
On 14.04.2025 13:48, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > On 4/10/25 10:48 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 09.04.2025 21:01, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h >>> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h >>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> +#inc

Re: [PATCH v3] xen/riscv: Increase XEN_VIRT_SIZE

2025-04-14 Thread Oleksii Kurochko
On 4/10/25 10:48 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 09.04.2025 21:01, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -35,6 +36,11 @@ static inline void *madd

Re: [PATCH v3] xen/riscv: Increase XEN_VIRT_SIZE

2025-04-10 Thread Jan Beulich
On 09.04.2025 21:01, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include > @@ -35,6 +36,11 @@ static inline void *maddr_to_virt(paddr_t ma) >

[PATCH v3] xen/riscv: Increase XEN_VIRT_SIZE

2025-04-09 Thread Oleksii Kurochko
A randconfig job failed with the following issue: riscv64-linux-gnu-ld: Xen too large for early-boot assumptions The reason is that enabling the UBSAN config increased the size of the Xen binary. Increase XEN_VIRT_SIZE to reserve enough space, allowing both UBSAN and GCOV to be enabled together