On 2025-03-24 08:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
As per observation in practice, initrd->cmdline_pa is not normally zero.
Hence so far we always appended at least one byte. That alone may
already render insufficient the "allocation" made by find_memory().
Things would be worse when there's actually a (per
On 24.03.2025 19:24, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/03/2025 12:03 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> As per observation in practice, initrd->cmdline_pa is not normally zero.
>> Hence so far we always appended at least one byte. That alone may
>> already render insufficient the "allocation" made by find_memory
On 24/03/2025 12:03 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> As per observation in practice, initrd->cmdline_pa is not normally zero.
> Hence so far we always appended at least one byte. That alone may
> already render insufficient the "allocation" made by find_memory().
> Things would be worse when there's actual
As per observation in practice, initrd->cmdline_pa is not normally zero.
Hence so far we always appended at least one byte. That alone may
already render insufficient the "allocation" made by find_memory().
Things would be worse when there's actually a (perhaps long) command
line.
Skip setup when