On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 11:59 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.06.2024 16:20, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > The current check used in fixup_irqs() to decide whether to move
> > around
> > interrupts is based on the affinity mask, but such mask can have
> > all bits set,
> > and hence is unlikely to be
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:59:39AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.06.2024 16:20, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > The current check used in fixup_irqs() to decide whether to move around
> > interrupts is based on the affinity mask, but such mask can have all bits
> > set,
> > and hence is unlikely to
On 10.06.2024 16:20, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> The current check used in fixup_irqs() to decide whether to move around
> interrupts is based on the affinity mask, but such mask can have all bits set,
> and hence is unlikely to be a subset of the input mask. For example if an
> interrupt has an affi
The current check used in fixup_irqs() to decide whether to move around
interrupts is based on the affinity mask, but such mask can have all bits set,
and hence is unlikely to be a subset of the input mask. For example if an
interrupt has an affinity mask of all 1s, any input to fixup_irqs() that'