On 2024-05-14 03:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.05.2024 19:40, Jason Andryuk wrote:
On 2023-12-18 09:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
@@ -425,6 +425,72 @@ static struct platform_timesource __init
.resume = resume_pit,
};
+unsigned int __init
On 10.05.2024 19:40, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On 2023-12-18 09:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> @@ -425,6 +425,72 @@ static struct platform_timesource __init
>> .resume = resume_pit,
>> };
>>
>> +unsigned int __initdata pit_alias_mask;
>>
On 2023-12-18 09:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
... in order to also deny Dom0 access through the alias ports. Without
this it is only giving the impression of denying access to PIT. Unlike
for CMOS/RTC, do detection pretty early, to avoid disturbing normal
operation later on (even if typically we won't
... in order to also deny Dom0 access through the alias ports. Without
this it is only giving the impression of denying access to PIT. Unlike
for CMOS/RTC, do detection pretty early, to avoid disturbing normal
operation later on (even if typically we won't use much of the PIT).
Like for CMOS/RTC a
