On 2/23/21 1:02 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:40:07AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 2/23/21 11:11 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39:48AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
Before I do that though --- what was the conclusion on verbosi
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:40:07AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> On 2/23/21 11:11 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39:48AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >
> >> Before I do that though --- what was the conclusion on verbosity control?
> > Ideally I would like to find
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 05:10:16PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.02.2021 16:39, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > Before I do that though --- what was the conclusion on verbosity
> > control?
>
> Not sure - afaict the conclusion was that we still don't really
> agree. Roger?
As I said on my reply to
On 2/23/21 11:11 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39:48AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>> Before I do that though --- what was the conclusion on verbosity control?
> Ideally I would like to find a way to have a more generic interface to
> change verbosity level on a per-
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39:48AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> On 2/23/21 8:23 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 23.02.2021 13:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:15:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.02.2021 10:34, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 202
On 23.02.2021 16:39, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> On 2/23/21 8:23 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.02.2021 13:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:15:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.02.2021 10:34, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:57:00AM +0100, Ja
On 2/23/21 8:23 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.02.2021 13:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:15:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 23.02.2021 10:34, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:57:00AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.02.2021 22:19, Boris O
On 23.02.2021 13:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:15:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.02.2021 10:34, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:57:00AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.02.2021 22:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> On 2/22/21 6:08 AM,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:15:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.02.2021 10:34, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:57:00AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 22.02.2021 22:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2/22/21 6:08 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19,
On 23.02.2021 10:34, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:57:00AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.02.2021 22:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/22/21 6:08 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 2/18/21 5:51 AM
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:57:00AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.02.2021 22:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >
> > On 2/22/21 6:08 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>> On 2/18/21 5:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20
On 22.02.2021 22:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> On 2/22/21 6:08 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 2/18/21 5:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:49:10PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> When toolstack u
On 2/22/21 6:08 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 2/18/21 5:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:49:10PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
When toolstack updates MSR policy, this MSR offset (which is the la
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> On 2/18/21 5:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:49:10PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> When toolstack updates MSR policy, this MSR offset (which is the last
> >> index in the hypervisor MSR range) is
On 2/18/21 5:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:49:10PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> When toolstack updates MSR policy, this MSR offset (which is the last
>> index in the hypervisor MSR range) is used to indicate hypervisor
>> behavior when guest accesses an MSR which
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:49:10PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> When toolstack updates MSR policy, this MSR offset (which is the last
> index in the hypervisor MSR range) is used to indicate hypervisor
> behavior when guest accesses an MSR which is not explicitly emulated.
It's kind of weird to
On 1/22/21 6:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Also, Andrew, (I think I did say so before) - I definitely
> would want your general consent with this model, as what gets
> altered here is almost all relatively recent contributions
> by you. Nor would I exclude the approach being controversial.
>
Andre
On 1/22/21 6:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.01.2021 23:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
>> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ int guest_rdmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t
>> *val)
>> }
>>
>> /* Fallthrough. */
>> -case 0x40
On 20.01.2021 23:49, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msr.c
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ int guest_rdmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t
> *val)
> }
>
> /* Fallthrough. */
> -case 0x4200 ... 0x42ff:
> +case 0x4200 ... 0x
When toolstack updates MSR policy, this MSR offset (which is the last
index in the hypervisor MSR range) is used to indicate hypervisor
behavior when guest accesses an MSR which is not explicitly emulated.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
Changes in v2:
* Use 0x42ff for MSR_UNHANDLED
* Pass
20 matches
Mail list logo
