On Fri, 2024-11-15 at 01:46 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14 2024 at 10:05, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 17:22 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 13 2024 at 13:41, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > > > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be ma
On Thu, Nov 14 2024 at 10:05, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 17:22 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13 2024 at 13:41, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>> > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed
>> > through
>> > devres. This hybrid nature is undesirable.
>
On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 17:22 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13 2024 at 13:41, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed
> > through
> > devres. This hybrid nature is undesirable.
> >
> > Since all users of pci_intx() have by now been port
On Wed, Nov 13 2024 at 13:41, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed through
> devres. This hybrid nature is undesirable.
>
> Since all users of pci_intx() have by now been ported either to
> always-managed pcim_intx() or never-managed pci_intx_unman
pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed through
devres. This hybrid nature is undesirable.
Since all users of pci_intx() have by now been ported either to
always-managed pcim_intx() or never-managed pci_intx_unmanaged(), the
devres functionality can be removed from pci_intx(
