Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] x86: Introduce x86_decode_lite()

2024-10-08 Thread Jan Beulich
On 07.10.2024 19:17, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 07/10/2024 1:56 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 02.10.2024 17:27, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/decode-lite.c >>> @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ >>> + >>> +#include "private.h

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] x86: Introduce x86_decode_lite()

2024-10-07 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 07/10/2024 1:56 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 02.10.2024 17:27, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/decode-lite.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ >> + >> +#include "private.h" >> + >> +#define Imm8 (1 << 0) >> +#define Imm

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] x86: Introduce x86_decode_lite()

2024-10-07 Thread Jan Beulich
On 02.10.2024 17:27, Andrew Cooper wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/decode-lite.c > @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > + > +#include "private.h" > + > +#define Imm8 (1 << 0) > +#define Imm(1 << 1) > +#define Moffs (1 << 2) > +#define Bra

[PATCH v2 1/7] x86: Introduce x86_decode_lite()

2024-10-02 Thread Andrew Cooper
In order to relocate all IP-relative fields in an alternative replacement block, we need to decode the instructions enough to obtain their length and any relative fields. Full x86_decode() is far too heavyweight, so introduce a minimal form which can make several simplifying assumptions. This a m