On 08.10.20 10:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:30:10PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
Actions in NMI context are rather limited as e.g. locking is rather
fragile.
Add a generic framework to continue processing in softirq context after
leaving NMI processing. This is working f
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:30:10PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Actions in NMI context are rather limited as e.g. locking is rather
> fragile.
>
> Add a generic framework to continue processing in softirq context after
> leaving NMI processing. This is working for NMIs happening in guest
> contex
Actions in NMI context are rather limited as e.g. locking is rather
fragile.
Add a generic framework to continue processing in softirq context after
leaving NMI processing. This is working for NMIs happening in guest
context as NMI exit handling will issue an IPI to itself in case a
softirq is pen