On 12.07.2021 22:32, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> The generic event channel labeling has not been used by any XSM module since
> its introduction. This commit removes the capability leaving FLASK labeling
> field always present. In the future if a new XSM module needs to have its own
> channel label, t
On 7/12/21 7:52 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 12/07/2021 21:32, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> The generic event channel labeling has not been used by any XSM module since
>> its introduction. This commit removes the capability leaving FLASK labeling
>> field always present. In the future if a new XSM m
On 12/07/2021 21:32, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> The generic event channel labeling has not been used by any XSM module since
> its introduction. This commit removes the capability leaving FLASK labeling
> field always present. In the future if a new XSM module needs to have its own
> channel label, t
The generic event channel labeling has not been used by any XSM module since
its introduction. This commit removes the capability leaving FLASK labeling
field always present. In the future if a new XSM module needs to have its own
channel label, this or a new form can be introduced.
---
xen/common
