On 24.11.2023 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> In the subject, [ -> {
>
> ?
Right, noticed (sadly) just after sending, and already corrected locally.
> On 24/11/2023 8:38 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> ... to evaluate to false at compile-time when the respective Kconfig
>> control is off, thus allowing
In the subject, [ -> {
?
On 24/11/2023 8:38 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... to evaluate to false at compile-time when the respective Kconfig
> control is off, thus allowing the compiler to eliminate then-dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper
I've got part of a series
... to evaluate to false at compile-time when the respective Kconfig
control is off, thus allowing the compiler to eliminate then-dead code.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v2: New.
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -215,8 +215,10 @@ static
