On 30.04.2024 18:08, Elias El Yandouzi wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/domain.c
>>> @@ -288,6 +288,19 @@ static void pv_destroy_gdt_ldt_l1tab(struct vcpu *v)
>>> 1U << GDT_LDT_VCPU_SHIFT);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int pv_create_s
Hi Jan,
From: Hongyan Xia
Before, it assumed the pv cr3 could be accessed via a direct map. This
is no longer true.
There are a number of terminology issues here, starting with the title:
Unlike (iirc) in an earlier version, no mapping/unmapping occurs in
restore_all_guests itself anymore.
On 16.01.2024 20:25, Elias El Yandouzi wrote:
> From: Hongyan Xia
>
> Before, it assumed the pv cr3 could be accessed via a direct map. This
> is no longer true.
There are a number of terminology issues here, starting with the title:
Unlike (iirc) in an earlier version, no mapping/unmapping occu
From: Hongyan Xia
Before, it assumed the pv cr3 could be accessed via a direct map. This
is no longer true.
Note that we do not map and unmap root_pgt for now since it is still a
xenheap page.
Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Signed-off-by: Elias El Yandouzi
