On 06.12.2023 21:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/12/2023 1:35 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The rule demands that all array elements be initialized (or dedicated
>> initializers be used). Introduce a small set of macros to allow doing so
>> without unduly affecting use sites (in particular in terms of
On 05/12/2023 1:35 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The rule demands that all array elements be initialized (or dedicated
> initializers be used). Introduce a small set of macros to allow doing so
> without unduly affecting use sites (in particular in terms of how many
> elements .matches[] actually has; r
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The rule demands that all array elements be initialized (or dedicated
> initializers be used). Introduce a small set of macros to allow doing so
> without unduly affecting use sites (in particular in terms of how many
> elements .matches[] actually has; righ
Hi Jan,
On 2023-12-05 14:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
The rule demands that all array elements be initialized (or dedicated
initializers be used). Introduce a small set of macros to allow doing
so
without unduly affecting use sites (in particular in terms of how many
elements .matches[] actually has
The rule demands that all array elements be initialized (or dedicated
initializers be used). Introduce a small set of macros to allow doing so
without unduly affecting use sites (in particular in terms of how many
elements .matches[] actually has; right now there's no use of
DMI_MATCH4(), so we cou
