Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-16 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:32 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 01.06.2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > Tamas K Lengyel (13): > > x86/mem_sharing: block interrupt injection for forks > > tools/libxc: xc_memshr_fork with interrupts blocked > > I've committed these two, and I'll leave the rest to

Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 01.06.2020 15:21, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > Tamas K Lengyel (13): > x86/mem_sharing: block interrupt injection for forks > tools/libxc: xc_memshr_fork with interrupts blocked I've committed these two, and I'll leave the rest to the tool stack maintainers. Jan

Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 15.06.2020 21:27, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:39 AM Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> On 02.06.2020 09:37, Paul Durrant wrote: >>> Maintainers/committers, can we please get those patches in a.s.a.p.? >> >> The sole reason I didn't put in at least the 1st patch on Friday >> (perhaps

Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-15 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:39 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 02.06.2020 09:37, Paul Durrant wrote: > > Maintainers/committers, can we please get those patches in a.s.a.p.? > > The sole reason I didn't put in at least the 1st patch on Friday > (perhaps also the 2nd, as it is suitably ack-ed) was that i

Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-02 Thread Jan Beulich
On 02.06.2020 09:37, Paul Durrant wrote: > Maintainers/committers, can we please get those patches in a.s.a.p.? The sole reason I didn't put in at least the 1st patch on Friday (perhaps also the 2nd, as it is suitably ack-ed) was that it's still missing a VMX maintainer ack, and Kevin had provided

RE: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Durrant
; Ian Jackson ; Jan > Beulich ; > Anthony Perard ; Julien Grall ; > Roger Pau Monne > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:11 AM George Dunlap > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Pa

Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-01 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
t; >> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > >> Cc: Kevin Tian ; Stefano Stabellini > >> ; Tamas K Lengyel > >> ; Jun Nakajima ; Wei Liu > >> ; Andrew Cooper > >> ; Ian Jackson ; > >> George Dunlap > >> ; Tamas K Lengyel ; Jan &g

Re: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-01 Thread George Dunlap
t; ; Tamas K Lengyel >> ; Jun Nakajima ; Wei Liu >> ; Andrew Cooper >> ; Ian Jackson ; George >> Dunlap >> ; Tamas K Lengyel ; Jan >> Beulich ; >> Anthony PERARD ; Julien Grall ; >> Roger Pau Monné >> >> Subject: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13

RE: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-01 Thread Paul Durrant
; George > Dunlap > ; Tamas K Lengyel ; Jan > Beulich ; > Anthony PERARD ; Julien Grall ; > Roger Pau Monné > > Subject: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking Hi, This series looks to be largely un-acked so, since we are now past the freeze date, I don't really think

[PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking

2020-06-01 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
The following patches are part of the series that implement VM forking for Intel HVM guests to allow for the fast creation of identical VMs without the assosciated high startup costs of booting or restoring the VM from a savefile. JIRA issue: https://xenproject.atlassian.net/browse/XEN-89 The for