Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] x86emul: support FLDENV and FRSTOR

2020-05-29 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 25/05/2020 15:29, Jan Beulich wrote: > While the Intel SDM claims that FRSTOR itself may raise #MF upon > completion, this was confirmed by Intel to be a doc error which will be > corrected in due course; behavior is like FLDENV, and like old hard copy > manuals describe it. > > Re-arrange a swi

[PATCH v10 8/9] x86emul: support FLDENV and FRSTOR

2020-05-25 Thread Jan Beulich
While the Intel SDM claims that FRSTOR itself may raise #MF upon completion, this was confirmed by Intel to be a doc error which will be corrected in due course; behavior is like FLDENV, and like old hard copy manuals describe it. Re-arrange a switch() statement's case label order to allow for fal