On 29/05/2020 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.05.2020 14:24, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 25/05/2020 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Unlike similarly encoded insns these don't write their memory operands,
>> "write to their".
>>
>>> and hence x86_is_mem_write() should return false for them. However,
On 29.05.2020 14:24, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/05/2020 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Unlike similarly encoded insns these don't write their memory operands,
>
> "write to their".
>
>> and hence x86_is_mem_write() should return false for them. However,
>> rather than adding special logic there,
On 25/05/2020 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Unlike similarly encoded insns these don't write their memory operands,
"write to their".
> and hence x86_is_mem_write() should return false for them. However,
> rather than adding special logic there, rework how their emulation gets
> done, by making dec
Unlike similarly encoded insns these don't write their memory operands,
and hence x86_is_mem_write() should return false for them. However,
rather than adding special logic there, rework how their emulation gets
done, by making decoding attributes properly describe the r/o nature of
their memory op
