Re: [PATCH for-4.16] tools/xenstored: Ignore domain we were unable to restore

2021-10-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Thanks everyone, committed. Ian.

Re: [PATCH for-4.16] tools/xenstored: Ignore domain we were unable to restore

2021-10-21 Thread Luca Fancellu
> On 20 Oct 2021, at 15:45, Julien Grall wrote: > > From: Julien Grall > > Commit 939775cfd3 "handle dying domains in live update" was meant to > handle gracefully dying domain. However, the @releaseDomain watch > will end up to be sent as soon as we finished to restore Xenstored > state. >

Re: [PATCH for-4.16] tools/xenstored: Ignore domain we were unable to restore

2021-10-20 Thread Juergen Gross
On 20.10.21 16:45, Julien Grall wrote: From: Julien Grall Commit 939775cfd3 "handle dying domains in live update" was meant to handle gracefully dying domain. However, the @releaseDomain watch will end up to be sent as soon as we finished to restore Xenstored state. This may be before Xen repo

Re: [PATCH for-4.16] tools/xenstored: Ignore domain we were unable to restore

2021-10-20 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Grall writes ("[PATCH for-4.16] tools/xenstored: Ignore domain we were unable to restore"): > From: Julien Grall > > Commit 939775cfd3 "handle dying domains in live update" was meant to > handle gracefully dying domain. However, the @releaseDomain watch

[PATCH for-4.16] tools/xenstored: Ignore domain we were unable to restore

2021-10-20 Thread Julien Grall
From: Julien Grall Commit 939775cfd3 "handle dying domains in live update" was meant to handle gracefully dying domain. However, the @releaseDomain watch will end up to be sent as soon as we finished to restore Xenstored state. This may be before Xen reports the domain to be dying (such as if th