Re: [PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV guests

2021-02-26 Thread Jan Beulich
On 25.02.2021 18:09, Andrew Cooper wrote: > The current code has an early exit for PV guests, but it returns 0 having done > nothing. > > Fixes: 524a98c2ac5 ("public / x86: introduce __HYPERCALL_dm_op...") > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich

Re: [PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV guests

2021-02-25 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV guests"): > On 25/02/2021 17:22, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV > > guests"): > >> The current code has an early

Re: [PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV guests

2021-02-25 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 25/02/2021 17:22, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV > guests"): >> The current code has an early exit for PV guests, but it returns 0 having >> done >> nothing. > Reviewed-by: Ian Jackson Thanks

Re: [PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV guests

2021-02-25 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV guests"): > The current code has an early exit for PV guests, but it returns 0 having done > nothing. Reviewed-by: Ian Jackson > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dm.c > index

[PATCH for-4.15] x86/dmop: Properly fail for PV guests

2021-02-25 Thread Andrew Cooper
The current code has an early exit for PV guests, but it returns 0 having done nothing. Fixes: 524a98c2ac5 ("public / x86: introduce __HYPERCALL_dm_op...") Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper --- CC: Jan Beulich CC: Roger Pau Monné CC: Wei Liu CC: Ian Jackson CC: Paul Durrant For 4.15. Found whil