On 18/06/2020 08:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.06.2020 16:15, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> This is some work in light of IvyBridge not gaining microcode to combat SRBDS
>> / XSA-320. It is a mix of some work I'd planned for 4.15, and some patches
>> posted already and delayed due to dependence's I'd d
On 15.06.2020 16:15, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This is some work in light of IvyBridge not gaining microcode to combat SRBDS
> / XSA-320. It is a mix of some work I'd planned for 4.15, and some patches
> posted already and delayed due to dependence's I'd discovered after-the-fact.
>
> This provides
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Durrant
> Sent: 15 June 2020 18:04
> To: 'Andrew Cooper' ; 'Xen-devel'
>
> Cc: 'Wei Liu' ; 'Jan Beulich' ; 'Ian
> Jackson' ;
> 'Roger Pau Monné'
> Subj
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel On Behalf Of Andrew
> Cooper
> Sent: 15 June 2020 15:15
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Wei Liu ; Paul Durrant ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Jan
> Beulich ; Ian Jackson ; Roger Pau
> Monné
>
> Subject: [PATCH for-4.14 0/9] XSA-320
This is some work in light of IvyBridge not gaining microcode to combat SRBDS
/ XSA-320. It is a mix of some work I'd planned for 4.15, and some patches
posted already and delayed due to dependence's I'd discovered after-the-fact.
This provides a more user-friendly way of making IvyBridge safe by
