On 24.09.20 14:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi Jan
On 22.09.2020 18:46, Oleksandr wrote:
On 14.09.20 18:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi Jan
On 10.09.2020 22:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
@@ -150,6 +150,18 @@ do_dm_op(
unsign
On 22.09.2020 18:46, Oleksandr wrote:
>
> On 14.09.20 18:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Hi Jan
>
>> On 10.09.2020 22:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>>> @@ -150,6 +150,18 @@ do_dm_op(
>>> unsigned int nr_bufs,
>>> X
On 23.09.20 20:35, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Julien
On 10/09/2020 21:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
I believe I am the original author of this code. So this needs to be
fixed accordingly.
Sorry, will fix.
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
On 10/09/2020 21:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
I believe I am the original author of this code. So this needs to be
fixed accordingly.
As a lot of x86 code can be re-used on Arm later on, this patch
splits devicemodel support into common and arch specific p
On 14.09.20 18:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi Jan
On 10.09.2020 22:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
@@ -150,6 +150,18 @@ do_dm_op(
unsigned int nr_bufs,
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_dm_op_buf_t) bufs);
+struct dmop_arg
On 10.09.2020 22:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,18 @@ do_dm_op(
> unsigned int nr_bufs,
> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_dm_op_buf_t) bufs);
>
> +struct dmop_args {
> +domid_t domid;
> +unsigne
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
As a lot of x86 code can be re-used on Arm later on, this patch
splits devicemodel support into common and arch specific parts.
Also update XSM code a bit to let DM op be used on Arm.
This support is going to be used on Arm to be able run device
emulator outside of Xe
