At 10:55 +0200 on 20 Jul (1595242521), Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.07.2020 20:20, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > At 12:00 +0200 on 15 Jul (1594814409), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> ... by the very fact that they're 3-level specific, while PV always gets
> >> run in 4-level mode. This requires adding some seemingl
On 18.07.2020 20:20, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 12:00 +0200 on 15 Jul (1594814409), Jan Beulich wrote:
>> ... by the very fact that they're 3-level specific, while PV always gets
>> run in 4-level mode. This requires adding some seemingly redundant
>> #ifdef-s - some of them will be possible to drop ag
At 12:00 +0200 on 15 Jul (1594814409), Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... by the very fact that they're 3-level specific, while PV always gets
> run in 4-level mode. This requires adding some seemingly redundant
> #ifdef-s - some of them will be possible to drop again once 2- and
> 3-level guest code doesn't
... by the very fact that they're 3-level specific, while PV always gets
run in 4-level mode. This requires adding some seemingly redundant
#ifdef-s - some of them will be possible to drop again once 2- and
3-level guest code doesn't get built anymore in !HVM configs, but I'm
afraid there's still q
