On 21.04.2021 16:21, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:36:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.04.2021 11:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:45:09AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
While they apparently do no harm when building xen.efi, their use is
p
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:36:16PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.04.2021 11:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:45:09AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> While they apparently do no harm when building xen.efi, their use is
> >> potentially misleading. Conditionalize their use
On 21.04.2021 11:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:45:09AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> While they apparently do no harm when building xen.efi, their use is
>> potentially misleading. Conditionalize their use to be for just the ELF
>> binary we produce.
>>
>> No change to the
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:45:09AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While they apparently do no harm when building xen.efi, their use is
> potentially misleading. Conditionalize their use to be for just the ELF
> binary we produce.
>
> No change to the resulting binaries.
The GNU Linker manual notes t
While they apparently do no harm when building xen.efi, their use is
potentially misleading. Conditionalize their use to be for just the ELF
binary we produce.
No change to the resulting binaries.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
@@ -34,13 +34
