On 3/18/25 6:35 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
It's unclear why -N is being used in the first place. It was added by
commit 40828c657dd0c back in 2004 without any justification.
When building a PE image it's actually detrimental to forcefully set the
.text section as writable. The GNU LD man page
On 18.03.2025 18:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> It's unclear why -N is being used in the first place. It was added by
> commit 40828c657dd0c back in 2004 without any justification.
Not really, no. That only moved it from LDFLAGS to an explicit use. Several
hops earlier it looks to be 4676bbf96dc8 (
It's unclear why -N is being used in the first place. It was added by
commit 40828c657dd0c back in 2004 without any justification.
When building a PE image it's actually detrimental to forcefully set the
.text section as writable. The GNU LD man page contains the following
warning regarding the
On 18/03/2025 5:35 pm, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> It's unclear why -N is being used in the first place. It was added by
> commit 40828c657dd0c back in 2004 without any justification.
>
> When building a PE image it's actually detrimental to forcefully set the
> .text section as writable. The GNU LD