Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu-policy: Infrastructure for MSR_ARCH_CAPS

2023-05-22 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.05.2023 17:36, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 16/05/2023 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 15.05.2023 16:42, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> Bits through 24 are already defined, meaning that we're not far off needing >>> the second word. Put both in right away. >>> >>> The bool bitfield names in the arc

Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu-policy: Infrastructure for MSR_ARCH_CAPS

2023-05-19 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/05/2023 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 15.05.2023 16:42, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Bits through 24 are already defined, meaning that we're not far off needing >> the second word. Put both in right away. >> >> The bool bitfield names in the arch_caps union are unused, and somewhat out >> of

Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu-policy: Infrastructure for MSR_ARCH_CAPS

2023-05-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 15.05.2023 16:42, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Bits through 24 are already defined, meaning that we're not far off needing > the second word. Put both in right away. > > The bool bitfield names in the arch_caps union are unused, and somewhat out of > date. They'll shortly be automatically generated

[PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu-policy: Infrastructure for MSR_ARCH_CAPS

2023-05-15 Thread Andrew Cooper
Bits through 24 are already defined, meaning that we're not far off needing the second word. Put both in right away. The bool bitfield names in the arch_caps union are unused, and somewhat out of date. They'll shortly be automatically generated. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper --- CC: Jan Beulich