On 9/17/2020 10:40 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 10:09 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 16.09.2020 20:18, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
>>> @@ -119,10 +119,9 @@ static int dom_handle_cmp(const
>>> xen_domain_handle
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 10:09 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.09.2020 20:18, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
> > --- a/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
> > @@ -119,10 +119,9 @@ static int dom_handle_cmp(const
> > xen_domain_handle_t h1,
> > return memcmp(h1, h2, sizeof(xe
On 16.09.2020 20:18, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
> @@ -119,10 +119,9 @@ static int dom_handle_cmp(const xen_domain_handle_t h1,
> return memcmp(h1, h2, sizeof(xen_domain_handle_t));
> }
>
> -static struct sched_unit *find_unit
Function definitions in the arinc653 module did not follow the Xen
coding style. Furthermore, a few function names used a different prefix.
This change cleans up the definitions to be consistent with the Xen
coding style, and has no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kubascik
---
xen/common
