On 24.09.2024 17:21, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:26 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>
> ... omissis ...
>
>>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@
> */
>
> void __init noreturn efi_multiboot2(EFI_HANDLE Imag
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:26 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
... omissis ...
>
> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c
> >>> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@
> >>> */
> >>>
> >>> void __init noreturn efi_multiboot2(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle,
> >>> -EF
On 16.09.2024 10:25, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 8:00 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.09.2024 18:16, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> -.Lefi_multiboot2_proto:
>>> -/* Zero EFI SystemTable, EFI ImageHandle addresses and cmdline. */
>>> -xor %esi,%esi
>>> -x
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 8:00 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 10.09.2024 18:16, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > No need to have it coded in assembly.
>
> As to the title: It's the EFI/MB2 case you re-write. That wants reflecting
> there, as the "normal" EFI start part is all C already anyway. I also
> thin
On 10.09.2024 18:16, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> No need to have it coded in assembly.
As to the title: It's the EFI/MB2 case you re-write. That wants reflecting
there, as the "normal" EFI start part is all C already anyway. I also
think you mean "partly"?
> @@ -255,34 +246,29 @@ __efi64_mb2_start:
No need to have it coded in assembly.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
---
xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S | 131 ++
xen/arch/x86/efi/Makefile | 1 +
xen/arch/x86/efi/parse-mbi2.c | 54 ++
xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c | 3 +-
4 files changed, 80
