On 05.04.2023 23:29, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 04/04/2023 3:50 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> This insn differs from WRMSR solely in the lack of serialization. Hence
>> the code used there can simply be used here as well, plus a feature
>> check of course.
>
> I have a feeling this is a bit stale now t
On 04/04/2023 3:50 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This insn differs from WRMSR solely in the lack of serialization. Hence
> the code used there can simply be used here as well, plus a feature
> check of course.
I have a feeling this is a bit stale now that 0f01.c has moved into a
separate file ?
> As
This insn differs from WRMSR solely in the lack of serialization. Hence
the code used there can simply be used here as well, plus a feature
check of course. As there's no other infrastructure needed beyond
permitting the insn for PV privileged-op emulation (in particular no
separate new VMEXIT) we
