On 15.06.2020 16:15, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The existing x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer() does produce sorted results, and we're
> about to start relying on this. Extend the unit tests.
>
> As test_cpuid_serialise_success() is a fairly limited set of synthetic
> examples right now, introduce test_cpuid
On 15.06.2020 18:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 15/06/2020 16:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID
>> serialisation is sorted"):
>>> Nothing runs it by default, but it is part of my prepush testin
On 15/06/2020 16:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID
> serialisation is sorted"):
>> Nothing runs it by default, but it is part of my prepush testing for
>> anything in the relevant area.
>>
>>
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID
serialisation is sorted"):
> Nothing runs it by default, but it is part of my prepush testing for
> anything in the relevant area.
>
> We should do something better, but its not totally trivial. T
On 15/06/2020 15:52, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID
> serialisation is sorted"):
>> The existing x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer() does produce sorted results, and
>> we're
>> about to start relying on
Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH 2/9] tests/cpu-policy: Confirm that CPUID
serialisation is sorted"):
> The existing x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer() does produce sorted results, and we're
> about to start relying on this. Extend the unit tests.
>
> As test_cpuid_serialise_su
The existing x86_cpuid_copy_to_buffer() does produce sorted results, and we're
about to start relying on this. Extend the unit tests.
As test_cpuid_serialise_success() is a fairly limited set of synthetic
examples right now, introduce test_cpuid_current() to operate on the full
policy for the cur
