RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mtrr: move epte_get_entry_emt to p2m-ept.c

2021-06-17 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 1:40 AM > > This is an EPT specific function, so it shouldn't live in the generic > mtrr file. Such movement is also needed for future work that will > require passing a p2m_type_t parameter to epte_get_entry_emt, and > making that type visib

Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mtrr: move epte_get_entry_emt to p2m-ept.c

2021-05-31 Thread Jan Beulich
On 28.05.2021 19:39, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > This is an EPT specific function, so it shouldn't live in the generic > mtrr file. Such movement is also needed for future work that will > require passing a p2m_type_t parameter to epte_get_entry_emt, and > making that type visible to the mtrr users is

[PATCH 2/3] x86/mtrr: move epte_get_entry_emt to p2m-ept.c

2021-05-28 Thread Roger Pau Monne
This is an EPT specific function, so it shouldn't live in the generic mtrr file. Such movement is also needed for future work that will require passing a p2m_type_t parameter to epte_get_entry_emt, and making that type visible to the mtrr users is cumbersome and unneeded. Moving epte_get_entry_emt