Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH 2/3] tools/firmware: Build firmware as
-ffreestanding"):
> firmware should always have been -ffreestanding, as it doesn't execute in the
> host environment.
>
> inttypes.h isn't a freestanding header, but the 32bitbios_support.c on
On 26/02/2021 09:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.02.2021 21:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> firmware should always have been -ffreestanding, as it doesn't execute in the
>> host environment.
>>
>> inttypes.h isn't a freestanding header, but the 32bitbios_support.c only
>> wants
>> the stdint.h types so
On 25.02.2021 21:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> firmware should always have been -ffreestanding, as it doesn't execute in the
> host environment.
>
> inttypes.h isn't a freestanding header, but the 32bitbios_support.c only wants
> the stdint.h types so switch to the more appropriate include.
>
> This
firmware should always have been -ffreestanding, as it doesn't execute in the
host environment.
inttypes.h isn't a freestanding header, but the 32bitbios_support.c only wants
the stdint.h types so switch to the more appropriate include.
This removes the build time dependency on a 32bit libc just
