On 2020-06-25 22:26, Souptick Joarder wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:19 AM John Hubbard wrote:
On 2020-06-24 20:02, Souptick Joarder wrote:
...
@@ -612,13 +612,7 @@ static int lock_pages(
static void unlock_pages(struct page *pages[], unsigned int nr_pages)
{
- unsigned int i;
-
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:19 AM John Hubbard wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-24 20:02, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > In 2019, we introduced pin_user_pages*() and now we are converting
> > get_user_pages*() to the new API as appropriate. [1] & [2] could
> > be referred for more information. This is case 5 as
On 2020-06-24 20:02, Souptick Joarder wrote:
In 2019, we introduced pin_user_pages*() and now we are converting
get_user_pages*() to the new API as appropriate. [1] & [2] could
be referred for more information. This is case 5 as per document [1].
[1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
[2
In 2019, we introduced pin_user_pages*() and now we are converting
get_user_pages*() to the new API as appropriate. [1] & [2] could
be referred for more information. This is case 5 as per document [1].
[1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
[2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages":