On 29.12.2020 11:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 01:39:55PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/boot.c
>> @@ -422,8 +422,7 @@ acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info(struct acpi_t
>> if (!facs_pa)
>> goto bad;
>>
>> -
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 01:39:55PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info() runs when the system is already in
> SYS_STATE_boot. Hence its direct call to __acpi_map_table() won't work
> anymore. This call should probably have been replaced long ago already,
> as the layering violati
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 01:39:55PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info() runs when the system is already in
> SYS_STATE_boot. Hence its direct call to __acpi_map_table() won't work
> anymore. This call should probably have been replaced long ago already,
> as the layering violati
acpi_fadt_parse_sleep_info() runs when the system is already in
SYS_STATE_boot. Hence its direct call to __acpi_map_table() won't work
anymore. This call should probably have been replaced long ago already,
as the layering violation hasn't been necessary for quite some time.
Fixes: 1c4aa69ca1e1 ("