On 2024-06-26 03:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.06.2024 12:14, Alessandro Zucchelli wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/kernel.c
> +++ b/xen/common/kernel.c
> @@ -660,14 +660,15 @@ long do_xen_version(int cmd,
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>
> ca
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.06.2024 12:14, Alessandro Zucchelli wrote:
> > --- a/xen/common/kernel.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/kernel.c
> > @@ -660,14 +660,15 @@ long do_xen_version(int cmd,
> > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> >
> > case XENVER_guest_handle:
> > {
>
On 25.06.2024 12:14, Alessandro Zucchelli wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/kernel.c
> +++ b/xen/common/kernel.c
> @@ -660,14 +660,15 @@ long do_xen_version(int cmd,
> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>
> case XENVER_guest_handle:
> {
> +struct domain *d = current->domain;
Can a (new
In the file common/kernel.c macro ARRAY_SIZE is called with argument
current->domain->handle.
Once expanded, this ARRAY_SIZE's argument is used in sizeof operations
and thus 'current', being a macro that expands to a function
call with potential side effects, generates a violation.
To address this
