On 30.10.20 15:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.2020 15:24, Juergen Gross wrote:
Even if a spinlock was taken with interrupts on before calling
spin_trylock() with interrupts off is fine, as it can't block.
Add a bool parameter "try" to check_lock() for handling this case.
Remove the call of ch
On 30.10.2020 15:24, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Even if a spinlock was taken with interrupts on before calling
> spin_trylock() with interrupts off is fine, as it can't block.
>
> Add a bool parameter "try" to check_lock() for handling this case.
>
> Remove the call of check_lock() from _spin_is_lock
Even if a spinlock was taken with interrupts on before calling
spin_trylock() with interrupts off is fine, as it can't block.
Add a bool parameter "try" to check_lock() for handling this case.
Remove the call of check_lock() from _spin_is_locked(), as it really
serves no purpose and it can even l
