On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> > On 13 Feb 2023, at 09:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > On 10.02.2023 16:54, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> >>> On 2 Feb 2023, at 12:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.02.2023 12:08, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> (is hw_cap only for x86?)
> >>>
>
Hi Jan,
> On 13 Feb 2023, at 09:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 10.02.2023 16:54, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>> On 2 Feb 2023, at 12:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 02.02.2023 12:08, Luca Fancellu wrote:
(is hw_cap only for x86?)
>>>
>>> I suppose it is, but I also expect it would better go away t
On 10.02.2023 16:54, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> On 2 Feb 2023, at 12:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.02.2023 12:08, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>> (is hw_cap only for x86?)
>>
>> I suppose it is, but I also expect it would better go away than be moved.
>> It doesn't hold a complete set of information, and
> On 2 Feb 2023, at 12:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 02.02.2023 12:08, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> When the arm platform supports SVE, advertise the feature by a new
>> flag for the arch_capabilities in struct xen_sysctl_physinfo and add
>> a new field "arm_sve_vl_bits" where on arm there can be st
On 02.02.2023 12:08, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> When the arm platform supports SVE, advertise the feature by a new
> flag for the arch_capabilities in struct xen_sysctl_physinfo and add
> a new field "arm_sve_vl_bits" where on arm there can be stored the
> maximum SVE vector length in bits.
>
> Update
When the arm platform supports SVE, advertise the feature by a new
flag for the arch_capabilities in struct xen_sysctl_physinfo and add
a new field "arm_sve_vl_bits" where on arm there can be stored the
maximum SVE vector length in bits.
Update the padding.
Bump XEN_SYSCTL_INTERFACE_VERSION for t
