On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5:43 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 11.03.2025 21:47, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi Mykola,
> >
> > On 05/03/2025 09:11, Mykola Kvach wrote:
> >> If we call disable_nonboot_cpus on ARM64 with system_state set
> >> to SYS_STATE_suspend, the following assertion will be triggered:
On 11.03.2025 21:47, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Mykola,
>
> On 05/03/2025 09:11, Mykola Kvach wrote:
>> If we call disable_nonboot_cpus on ARM64 with system_state set
>> to SYS_STATE_suspend, the following assertion will be triggered:
>>
>> ```
>> (XEN) [ 25.582712] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>>
Hi Mykola,
On 05/03/2025 09:11, Mykola Kvach wrote:
If we call disable_nonboot_cpus on ARM64 with system_state set
to SYS_STATE_suspend, the following assertion will be triggered:
```
(XEN) [ 25.582712] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
(XEN) [ 25.587032] Assertion '!in_irq() && (local_irq_is_ena
If we call disable_nonboot_cpus on ARM64 with system_state set
to SYS_STATE_suspend, the following assertion will be triggered:
```
(XEN) [ 25.582712] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
(XEN) [ 25.587032] Assertion '!in_irq() && (local_irq_is_enabled() ||
num_online_cpus() <= 1)' failed at common/xm
