On 04.02.2022 23:13, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 5:06 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> This is to make it easier to see which parts of p2m.c still aren't HVM-
>> specific: In one case the conditionals sat in an already guarded region,
>> while in the other case P2M_AUDIT implies HVM.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 5:06 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> This is to make it easier to see which parts of p2m.c still aren't HVM-
> specific: In one case the conditionals sat in an already guarded region,
> while in the other case P2M_AUDIT implies HVM.
>
I think this would be much more easy to unders
This is to make it easier to see which parts of p2m.c still aren't HVM-
specific: In one case the conditionals sat in an already guarded region,
while in the other case P2M_AUDIT implies HVM.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
@@ -1584,11 +1584,10
