Kees Cook wrote:
> I'm happy to also point out that the conversions (patches 5+) are actually
> a net reduction in lines of code:
> 49 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 244 deletions(-)
That doesn't mean that it's actually code that's clearer to read. I would say
that it's actually less clea
Hi,
This is the next phase of memcpy() buffer bounds checking[1], which
starts by adding a new set of helpers to address common code patterns
that result in memcpy() usage that can't be easily verified by the
compiler (i.e. dynamic bounds due to flexible arrays). The runtime WARN
from memcpy has b
