Re: [PATCH 00/11] x86/shadow: misc tidying

2023-01-05 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 05/01/2023 3:57 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > ... or so I hope. The main observation was that we still have both > hash_vcpu_for_each() and hash_domain_for_each(), where the latter was foreach > introduced in 2014/15 to replace the former. Only some eight years > later we can now complete this conv

[PATCH 00/11] x86/shadow: misc tidying

2023-01-05 Thread Jan Beulich
... or so I hope. The main observation was that we still have both hash_vcpu_for_each() and hash_domain_for_each(), where the latter was introduced in 2014/15 to replace the former. Only some eight years later we can now complete this conversion. Everything else addresses other things noticed along