At 16:23 +0200 on 17 Apr (1587140581), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Large parts of this series are to further isolate pieces which
> are needed for HVM only, and hence would better not be built
> with HVM=n. But there are also a few other items which I've
> noticed along the road.
Acked-by: Tim Deegan
wi
On 17/04/2020 15:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Large parts of this series are to further isolate pieces which
> are needed for HVM only, and hence would better not be built
> with HVM=n. But there are also a few other items which I've
> noticed along the road.
>
> 01: mm: no-one passes a NULL domain to
Large parts of this series are to further isolate pieces which
are needed for HVM only, and hence would better not be built
with HVM=n. But there are also a few other items which I've
noticed along the road.
01: mm: no-one passes a NULL domain to init_xen_l4_slots()
02: shadow: drop a stray forwar
