Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: mostly shadow related XSA-319 follow-up

2020-07-18 Thread Tim Deegan
At 11:56 +0200 on 15 Jul (1594814214), Jan Beulich wrote: > This in particular goes a few small steps further towards proper > !HVM and !PV config handling (i.e. no carrying of unnecessary > baggage). > > 1: x86/shadow: dirty VRAM tracking is needed for HVM only > 2: x86/shadow: shadow_table[] nee

[PATCH 0/5] x86: mostly shadow related XSA-319 follow-up

2020-07-15 Thread Jan Beulich
This in particular goes a few small steps further towards proper !HVM and !PV config handling (i.e. no carrying of unnecessary baggage). 1: x86/shadow: dirty VRAM tracking is needed for HVM only 2: x86/shadow: shadow_table[] needs only one entry for PV-only configs 3: x86/PV: drop a few misleading