Re: [PATCH 0/5] tools/tests: More cleanup for automation improvements

2021-06-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.06.2021 15:22, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 16/06/2021 07:38, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 15.06.2021 18:19, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> Jan/Roger: x86_emulator and vpci use $(HOSTCC) not $(CC). While they are >>> unit >>> tests, we still potentially want to run them in dom0 rather than the build >>>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] tools/tests: More cleanup for automation improvements

2021-06-16 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/06/2021 07:38, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 15.06.2021 18:19, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Jan/Roger: x86_emulator and vpci use $(HOSTCC) not $(CC). While they are >> unit >> tests, we still potentially want to run them in dom0 rather than the build >> environment - particularly for x86_emulator whic

Re: [PATCH 0/5] tools/tests: More cleanup for automation improvements

2021-06-15 Thread Jan Beulich
On 15.06.2021 18:19, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Jan/Roger: x86_emulator and vpci use $(HOSTCC) not $(CC). While they are unit > tests, we still potentially want to run them in dom0 rather than the build > environment - particularly for x86_emulator which is heavily CPUID based and > wants to run on a

[PATCH 0/5] tools/tests: More cleanup for automation improvements

2021-06-15 Thread Andrew Cooper
This series takes us one step closer towards the "autotests" plan for simplifying the running of unit and low level system tests. With this series in place, all the tests which need running in dom0 have working install/uninstall targets, so they can be packaged suitably. Some questions, concernin