On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:06:31AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.05.2023 19:57, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > Nowadays AMD supports trapping the CPUID instruction from ring3 to ring0,
>
> Since it's relevant for PV32: Their doc talks about CPL > 0, i.e. not just
> ring 3. Therefore I wonder whe
On 05.05.2023 19:57, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Nowadays AMD supports trapping the CPUID instruction from ring3 to ring0,
Since it's relevant for PV32: Their doc talks about CPL > 0, i.e. not just
ring 3. Therefore I wonder whether ...
> (CpuidUserDis)
... we shouldn't deviate from the PM and av
Nowadays AMD supports trapping the CPUID instruction from ring3 to ring0,
(CpuidUserDis) akin to Intel's "CPUID faulting". There is a difference in
that the toggle bit is in a different MSR and the support bit is in CPUID
itself rather than yet another MSR. This patch enables AMD hosts to use it
wh
