On Wed, 17 Nov 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 16/11/2021 20:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> > So I think we can queue it in the Xen on ARM temporary for-next branch.
>
> I have pushed it to for-next/4.17 on both my repo and gitlab (hopefully this
> tri
Hi,
On 16/11/2021 20:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Luca Fancellu wrote:
So I think we can queue it in the Xen on ARM temporary for-next branch.
I have pushed it to for-next/4.17 on both my repo and gitlab (hopefully
this triggered a CI run).
Cheers,
Tested in this
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> Currently, the code used to handle and possibly load from the filesystem
> modules defined in the DT is allocating and closing the filesystem handle
> for each module to be loaded.
>
> To improve the performance, the filesystem handle pointer is passed
>
Luca Fancellu writes ("[PATCH-4.16] arm/efi: Improve performance requesting
filesystem handle"):
> Currently, the code used to handle and possibly load from the filesystem
> modules defined in the DT is allocating and closing the filesystem handle
> for each module to be load
Currently, the code used to handle and possibly load from the filesystem
modules defined in the DT is allocating and closing the filesystem handle
for each module to be loaded.
To improve the performance, the filesystem handle pointer is passed
through the call stack, requested when it's needed on
