On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:45:31AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 12.06.23 22:09, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 08:27:59AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 10.06.23 17:32, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > > When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:45:31AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 12.06.23 22:09, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 08:27:59AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 10.06.23 17:32, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > > When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux
On 12.06.23 22:09, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 08:27:59AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10.06.23 17:32, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list.
This lacks quite some context.
The main prob
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 08:27:59AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10.06.23 17:32, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
> > it on a deferred list.
>
> This lacks quite some context.
>
> The main problem is related to the grant not
On 12.06.23 08:27, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10.06.23 17:32, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list.
This lacks quite some context.
The main problem is related to the grant not having been unmapped after
the end of
On 10.06.23 17:32, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list.
This lacks quite some context.
The main problem is related to the grant not having been unmapped after
the end of a request, but the side granting the acc
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list. Normally, this list is very short, because
the PV network and block protocols expect the backend to unmap the grant
first. However, Qubes OS's GUI protocol is subject to the constraints
of the X Window
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:51:09AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 13.02.23 22:01, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > On 07.02.23 03:10, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > > When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux
On 13.02.23 22:01, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 07.02.23 03:10, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list. Normally, this list is very short, because
the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07.02.23 03:10, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
> > it on a deferred list. Normally, this list is very short, because
> > the PV network and block protocols exp
On 07.02.23 03:10, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list. Normally, this list is very short, because
the PV network and block protocols expect the backend to unmap the grant
first. However, Qubes OS's GUI protocol
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list. Normally, this list is very short, because
the PV network and block protocols expect the backend to unmap the grant
first. However, Qubes OS's GUI protocol is subject to the constraints
of the X Window
When a grant entry is still in use by the remote domain, Linux must put
it on a deferred list. Normally, this list is very short, because
the PV network and block protocols expect the backend to unmap the grant
first. However, Qubes OS's GUI protocol is subject to the constraints
of the X Window
13 matches
Mail list logo