On 20/03/2024 06:35, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 19.03.24 12:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
The single user wants this the sane way around. Write it as a normal
static
inline just like rspin_lock().
Fixes: cc3e8df542ed ("xen/spinlock: add
rspin_[un]lock_irq[save|restore]()")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Co
On 19.03.2024 12:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The single user wants this the sane way around. Write it as a normal static
> inline just like rspin_lock().
>
> Fixes: cc3e8df542ed ("xen/spinlock: add rspin_[un]lock_irq[save|restore]()")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Notwithstanding Jürgen's R-b I
On 19.03.24 12:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
The single user wants this the sane way around. Write it as a normal static
inline just like rspin_lock().
Fixes: cc3e8df542ed ("xen/spinlock: add rspin_[un]lock_irq[save|restore]()")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross
Maybe with
The single user wants this the sane way around. Write it as a normal static
inline just like rspin_lock().
Fixes: cc3e8df542ed ("xen/spinlock: add rspin_[un]lock_irq[save|restore]()")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Juergen Gross
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Stefano Stabellini
