Hi,
On 15/06/2023 00:46, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023, Michal Orzel wrote:
This is inconsistent with the rest of the code where macros are used
to define functions, as it results in an empty declaration (i.e.
semicolon with nothing before it) after function definition. This is
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023, Michal Orzel wrote:
> This is inconsistent with the rest of the code where macros are used
> to define functions, as it results in an empty declaration (i.e.
> semicolon with nothing before it) after function definition. This is also
> not allowed by C99.
>
> Take the opportun
On 14.06.2023 11:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
> This is inconsistent with the rest of the code where macros are used
> to define functions, as it results in an empty declaration (i.e.
> semicolon with nothing before it) after function definition. This is also
> not allowed by C99.
>
> Take the opportun
This is inconsistent with the rest of the code where macros are used
to define functions, as it results in an empty declaration (i.e.
semicolon with nothing before it) after function definition. This is also
not allowed by C99.
Take the opportunity to undefine TLB_HELPER* macros after last use.
S
