Re: [PATCH] x86emul/test: drop Xeon Phi S/G prefetch special case

2024-10-16 Thread Alejandro Vallejo
On Wed Oct 16, 2024 at 11:54 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 16.10.2024 12:34, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > > On Wed Oct 16, 2024 at 8:46 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c > >> +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c > >> @@ -911,10 +911,8 @@ static void

Re: [PATCH] x86emul/test: drop Xeon Phi S/G prefetch special case

2024-10-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.10.2024 12:34, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > On Wed Oct 16, 2024 at 8:46 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote: >> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c >> +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c >> @@ -911,10 +911,8 @@ static void test_one(const struct test * >> n = test->scale == SC_vl ? vs

Re: [PATCH] x86emul/test: drop Xeon Phi S/G prefetch special case

2024-10-16 Thread Alejandro Vallejo
On Wed Oct 16, 2024 at 8:46 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote: > Another leftover from the dropping of Xeon Phi support. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > --- > Note: I'm deliberately not switching to use of the conditional operator, > as the form as is resulting now is what we'll want for APX (which is >

Re: [PATCH] x86emul/test: drop Xeon Phi S/G prefetch special case

2024-10-16 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/10/2024 8:46 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > Another leftover from the dropping of Xeon Phi support. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Andrew Cooper

[PATCH] x86emul/test: drop Xeon Phi S/G prefetch special case

2024-10-16 Thread Jan Beulich
Another leftover from the dropping of Xeon Phi support. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- Note: I'm deliberately not switching to use of the conditional operator, as the form as is resulting now is what we'll want for APX (which is where I noticed this small piece of dead logic). --- a/tools/tests/