On 13/07/2021 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Oddly enough in the original report Coverity only complained about the
> native hypercall related switch() statements. Now that it has seen those
> fixed, it complains about (only HVM) compat ones. Hence the CIDs below
> are all for the HVM side of things,
Oddly enough in the original report Coverity only complained about the
native hypercall related switch() statements. Now that it has seen those
fixed, it complains about (only HVM) compat ones. Hence the CIDs below
are all for the HVM side of things, yet while at it take care of the PV
side as well
